- 698 小时
- 2199 点
- 7008 个
发表于 2016-5-21 09:10:56
烦 发表于 2016-5-18 18:57
https://news.ncsu.edu/2016/05/fr ... ineered-crops-2016/
"If a plant has intended or unintended novel characteristics that could potentially result in harm to the environment or human health, then it needs to be thoroughly tested. But if modern, high throughput methods for assessing a plant’s DNA, RNA and chemical metabolite composition show that there are no signs of intended or unintended alterations that could cause harm, there is no need for further testing. "
" No, the committee did not reach such a conclusion (whether GE crops are good or bad). "
" Maybe the greatest value in the report is pointing out that there is no straightforward answer. There has been a polarization of public opinion on GE crops, and please remember that researchers are not immune to such polarization. Once you or I conclude that GE crops are good or bad we look for more evidence to support our previous conclusion. I hope that people looking for our report to support a pro or con position on GE crops will initially be very disappointed in our report, but that they will read further to understand why we didn’t come to simple conclusions. "